AI Reviewer: A Second Look Before You Build
An AI reviewer can raise concrete concerns and revisit its own threads, while approval stays a human decision.
By David Hemphill ·
You can now add Livemark as a reviewer on a specification. It reads the current document and discussion, leaves anchored comments about consequential concerns, and returns a Ready or Not yet answer with a short summary.
The built-in review looks for contradictions, blocking questions, unclear scope or acceptance criteria, missing ownership, and conflicts with recorded team decisions. If the team has an applicable specification-review skill, the reviewer can use that procedure instead. The aim is a useful readiness check, not a list of stylistic preferences presented as blockers.
After changes, ask again. Re-review checks existing discussion before creating new threads and can resolve concerns it owns when the document or supported explanation actually addresses them. It cannot tidy away human threads simply because it considers the conversation finished.
The reviewer does not edit the specification and cannot approve it. Its readiness answer contributes to the review, but a person must make the act that moves the document to Approved. Treat its findings as another input to your judgment, not a replacement for the people responsible for the work.
Open a specification and add Livemark from its review controls.